Skodadriver
Site Supporter
Registered:May,2015
Location:Hampshire
Posts:892
| ||||||||
I compared this version 1 Sigma lens against a Pentax-M 28mm F3.5 and found it to have; Closer focussing. Obviously faster aperture. But; Not as good to my eyes. The images seem quite good in strong sunlight (see images) but lacking in contrast when the light is flatter. This makes the images seem to be not quite as sharp as the Pentax. Maybe they are not but the file sizes of JPEGs are pretty similar. Mine had no aperture lever guard and no sign of there having been one fitted. If you want a 28mm F2.8 and see a Sigma version 2, that might be even better than this one. If you see one of these version 1, chances are it will be cheap enough to be worth buying. I find it good enough for a 28mm lens but there are better ones as evidenced by the Pentax 28mm F3.5. My first image taken with this lens and a crop to show colour and sharpness in good light.
|
SalPro
New Member
Registered:June,2016
Posts:12
1 user found this helpful
| ||||||||
UPDATE: After going through half a dozen of those lenses here is the thing: there are two versions of Sigma Mini Wide 28mm.
Pictures below are from latest eBay listings and I did not purchase those exact once. I hope nobody object to use of those images? ORIGINAL REVIEW: From gathering info about it, this lens appeared to be better than most 28MM. I was hunting it for a while. Got 2 of them, both original, not v2. Apparently there is typical problems with them to be aware off. First test reveal that both lenses are hazy. It was rear surface of front doublet, second group accessible from the front. Both of them. Front surface on third group is clean and pristine. Go figure? Back to haze: difference was that in first lens haze has dried. In second it appeared as micro droplets that still wet. This is clearly visible from the back with bright front illumination. When cleaning first lens with alcohol or acetone those hazy spots flaked off leaving micro craters on glass. Glass looks clean and in good shape when wet. As it dries - haze returns. It took high magnification microscope to realize that glass is pitted and damaged irreparably. I'm guessing that coating has pure metal in it that corroded and pulled glass with it. Just a guess. It took me a wile to figure out how ot take it apart: Turn focus to macro, this will expose set screw. Use jewelers screwdriver to unscrew it. Then you may unscrew whole rim by bare hands. After that there is access to glass nuts. No slots for spanner in those, so you need rubber grip to go deeper. No other tricks. Takes one minute to get to front doublet. Even though one lens is damaged beyond repair, I will keep it as spare for the front and rear glass. After cleaning second lens haze completely gone. No halo or glow. Working lens is beautiful, sharp and contrasty, minimal wide angle distortions. Very nice lens, if yo can get one in good shape. Good luck! Sigma Mini Wide.28mm, wide open (2.8) 1:1 crop Wide open. Focus on the center horizon (Empire State Building). Lateral CA really good on this copy! |
satmary
New Member
Registered:November,2012
Location:Southern California
Posts:7
| ||||||||
It's a nice little 28mm 2.8 if you want to save some money, but I wouldn't recommend it for professional shoots. I shoot video as well, and I normally use it when I want to create a dreamy yet hazy feel. |